First of all, one must consider the vast quantity of music that digitalization makes possible. Hargittai and Tepper write, "Digital storefronts like iTunes, Napster, Rhapsody, and MusicMatch offer upwards of three million tracks-the equivalent of about 300,000 CDs." Yet, even with this surplus of available songs, services such as these are not doing well. Paul Resnikoff, the founder and publisher of Digital Music News, reports in one of his posts, "The Power of Context: Can Music Stand On Its Own?" that "The iTunes Store has sold more than five billion downloads since 2003, but the real money for Apple has always been in hardware. Meanwhile, almost every other online store has been marginalized and punished with weak volume." The problem is, once again, illegal music downloading; not many people are actually using these service due to the ease in which they can acquire the same songs for free. Illegal or not, however, the general population is now consuming their music from sources in which there are a dizzying number of options to choose from, and in response bands must change the way in which they market themselves. For one thing, I believe that this new format could point in a positive direction as far as live shows and festivals are concerned. In an ind
One way that consumers may respond to the digitalization of music is by focusing more on the context through which the products are presented to them and less on the content of the songs themselves. A good example of what I mean by this is the way in which people pay for ringtones. As Resnikoff says, "A ringtone is worth money because it expresses who you are.... An MP3 is worth nothing because it's a static piece of content." In other words, the music industry needs to discover ways of presenting their products to online users in interesting ways that cause them to want to pay for their music as it helps them to form an identity. As more young people are spending vast amounts of time interacting with one another on the internet, people like Eric Wahlforss, co-founder of SoundCloud, a new music sharing and distributing platform, claim, "That social networks are turning into... modern radio channels... where young people tune into... the context that's in there. They are not just listening to the music isolated in itself." So, it becomes more about the presentation of the product that entices the buyer to spend their money. Although, so far, the digitalization of music has not even come close to repairing the enormous fiscal damage done by the ravaging of the CD's importance, it is interesting to see, first hand, a way that "new inventions in the way sounds, images and texts are produced and captured have changed the way that artists and writers work, leading to new styles... and forms... of expression" (Hargittai and Tepper). Not only has the new medium, through which musicians must work now, changed the way that they produce their material, it has affected the way in which listeners find, access, and relate to it as well.
1 comment:
First off, I really like your title, "The Metamorphosis," as it is exotic and immediately draws in the reader. It is also perfectly supplemented by your first graphic parodying the chain of evolution. Both are compelling ways to capture your reader's attention, which is then kept by the timeliness and relevance of the topic at hand. Another strong point about your entry is that you go into great detail about the causes and effects of the digitalization of music, quoting different articles from Eszter Hargittai and Paul Resnikoff. Reading about the ways in which live concerts are affected by this new way of making music not only helps support your argument, but is a fascinating development in and of itself. I think the last paragraph of your post is perhaps the strongest element of all. The point about how music relates to a consumer's form of self-expression is by the far the most interesting aspect of this whole era of digitalization. Specifically, I liked your argument that "the music industry needs to discover ways of presenting their products to online users in interesting ways that cause them to want to pay for their music as it helps them to form an identity." To degree to which consumers relate to the music they listen to is indeed something to think about. If you continue this blog after this class is over, you might consider exploring that concept even further.
My only suggestion as to how you might improve this entry would be to include more links to external sources. For instance, you could provide a link to an article about RIAA's lawsuit against Napster ten years ago. Further engaging these outside resources would not only enrich your blog, but allow readers to delve more into the topic themselves and gain more background about the goings on in the music industry. Overall, this a very insightful post about a topic that is probably more relevant to the lives of individuals then they realize. Keep up the great work!
Post a Comment